You know it was once common knowledge in IDMR that we who believed on the true name of Yahshua the Messiah considered ourselves to be "Yahshuaians." I can recall Dr. Arrogant Defiant preaching not long after I familiarized myself with that term that to call ourselves "Yahshuaians" was just as bad as the followers of Jesus Christ calling themselves "Christians" because a Christian is someone who is trying "to be like Christ" or considering themselves to be Christ like. And for us to call ourselves Yahshuaians we would ignorantly be doing the same thing. Because to be "Yahshua like" when there's only one trying "to be like the most high" which is the satanic spirit as it is stated in Isaiah 14:14 "I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High." Foolishly and ignorantly most of us bought Dr. Arrogant Defiant's explanation and rarely, after that time, do I recall any of us refering to ourselves as Yahshuaians.
Looking back, I can see how this was all working toward the goal of where the organization currently stands. It was not long after this declaration by Dr. Defiant, that Dr. Heresies introduced the doctrinal point that "there is NO YOU" and "YOU don't exist" and "Yahweh is not saving YOU." These doctrinal issues were hammered into the peoples' hearts and minds and then whatever we believed that we were - it was then made clear that "YOU" didn't exist and "YOU" were a 3-fold negative entity - or a complete spiritual embodiment (spirit, soul and spiritual body) that was created negative and for the purpose of being cast down and out and REPLACED by a 3-fold righteous entity termed a "Birthed Son." These Birthed Sons for the longest had no clear identity. We couldn't call them Yahshua because that would have made them Yahshuaians and Dr. Arrogant Defiant had already effectively preached that that was not a correct term for one to call themselves.
So it was necessary to give these Birthed Sons a name. Because the scriptures do state that those that are saved their names are written in the Book of Life. So for these Birthed Sons to remain nameless would really pose as doctrinal dilemma for the regressive repulsive doctrine. So many are all calling themselves "Kinleynites."
As it was taught by the 3rd Speaker in the IDMR Birmingham, Alabama branch school on 01/16/11 which was a relative of mine after the flesh and someone who is in this organization because of my invitation to his sister who shortly thereafter invited him. He was very dogmatic and emphatic and preached that:
Henry Clifford Kinley is their savior! The Birthed Sons that were recently born are all "New born babes" as it is stated I Peter 2:2 "As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby:" The speaker clarified the reason why this would be so is because we act like we can understand that we can have Yahshua in us and accept someone referring to us by our name and yet not get confused - so just the same way, we should understand that the Creator could be in a physical body and not be confused when we refer to him as Henry Clifford Kinley - we're assuming we're better than him if we can do it and he couldn't! Just as we would not go to our jobs and asks them to change our name to Yahshua - and if we did we probably wouldn't get paid - even though that's who we really are and nor do we expect people to refer to us as Yahshua. Why then is it so hard to accept that Henry Clifford Kinley is your savior? I mean we call Ezekiel, Daniel, Isaiah, Jeremiah and we all know that it was Yahshua in each one of them but we still refer to them by the name they had when they walked the earthplane. So why is it so hard for those that are not Birthed Sons to accept that Henry Clifford Kinley is the savior? But then you can't do that if you're not one of the Birthed Sons. He further explained using the chart "Man by the Pattern" that the physical body that we called Henry Clifford Kinley is now in Ferncliff Cemetary and the spirit that was born in that body to his mother was also a 3-fold negative entity and she named him Henry Clifford Kinley but why can't we see that the man that did all the great works done by Henry Clifford Kinley and he had the scripture reader read some of the miracles performed by Henry Clifford Kinley out of the "Preaching and Teaching in the Name" (Now isn't that comical?) pamphlet. All these miracles could not have been performed by just a normal man so we should have no problem knowing that Henry Clifford Kinley is our savior! He got so animated he loss his glasses but then composed himself and said 10% know Henry Clifford Kinley is their savior 10% will never agree that Henry Clifford Kinley is their savior and 80% are just straddling the fence and Yahweh would prefer we be hot or cold but lukewarm and he will spew you out of his mouth!The speaker said he wouldn't change his stance on what he believes no matter what someone says to him. So I refused to cast my pearls before swine.
However, he was very correct on this point that we all should take a stand and we should be bold in whatever we believe! So it's safe to say a "Kinleynite" is "one who believes Henry Clifford Kinley is the savior of the world." So I will be bold and say I'm a child of the day and not the NITE and I refuse to be called by a name that 's got NITE in it! I Thess 5:5 "Ye are all the children of light, and the children of day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness." Therefore, I will gladly stay in the only name under heaven by which one can be saved "Yahshua" because salvation is in a name and I'm sorry the Kinleynites don't know Ephesians 3:14-15 "For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Savior Yahshua the Messiah. Of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named." So I thank my cousin for his clear demonstration to me as to what a KinleyNITE is - a damned fool!